| Hub You |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > News and Society > Religion > The Resurrection Is Past Already? 2 Timothy 2:16-18, Part 1of 4 |
|
Hub You - The Resurrection Is Past Already? 2 Timothy 2:16-18, Part 1of 4
Building A Master Keyword List A similar teaching had occurred some 14 to 18 years earlier in Thessalonica. Many in the church had stopped working because they believed that the day of Christ, i.e. second coming of the Lord had arrived and was already present. That time was A.D. 50, 51, (2 Thessalonians 2:2).Building a master keyword list is a very important step in having a profitable online business, keywords help with SEO (search engine optimization), pagerank and building traffic to your website. It is not the quantity of your keywords that count it is the quality and placement of the keywo Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unm The error of these two men is not readily apparent to the average reader. Why? It is because most approach the scriptures with a futuristic eschatological view. In other words, most believe that the events of the “last days,” are presently unfolding in our lifetime. Therefore to encounter a passage which condemns a teaching that says the resurrection, hence last days events are past, is to them, transparently false. The cause of the misapplication of the teaching of Hymanaeus and Philetus is a failure to appreciate the temporal reference, the historical setting and the immediate and remote contexts of the text. Let’s briefly consider them in order. The nature of the error is not that the resurrection was past. Paul’s concern with their doctrine was that they were saying the resurrection was past already. The temporal or chronological point of reference is the first century, during the ministry of the apostles. They taught that the resurrection was “at hand” near and about to come, (Acts 17:30, 31; Romans 13:11, 12, 1 Peter 4:5). Thus, the Hymanaean heresy contradicted the message of the apostles. The resurrection could not be “at hand” or imminent if it was in fact past already. A similar teaching had occurred some 14 to 18 years earlier in Thessalonica. Many in the church had stopped working because they believed that the day of Christ, i.e. second coming of the Lord had arrived and was already present. That time was A.D. 50, 51, (2 Thessalonians 2:2). Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unm The cause of the misapplication of the teaching of Hymanaeus and Philetus is a failure to appreciate the temporal reference, the historical setting and the immediate and remote contexts of the text. Let’s briefly consider them in order. The nature of the error is not that the resurrection was past. Paul’s concern with their doctrine was that they were saying the resurrection was past already. The temporal or chronological point of reference is the first century, during the ministry of the apostles. They taught that the resurrection was “at hand” near and about to come, (Acts 17:30, 31; Romans 13:11, 12, 1 Peter 4:5). Thus, the Hymanaean heresy contradicted the message of the apostles. The resurrection could not be “at hand” or imminent if it was in fact past already. A similar teaching had occurred some 14 to 18 years earlier in Thessalonica. Many in the church had stopped working because they believed that the day of Christ, i.e. second coming of the Lord had arrived and was already present. That time was A.D. 50, 51, (2 Thessalonians 2:2). Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unm The nature of the error is not that the resurrection was past. Paul’s concern with their doctrine was that they were saying the resurrection was past already. The temporal or chronological point of reference is the first century, during the ministry of the apostles. They taught that the resurrection was “at hand” near and about to come, (Acts 17:30, 31; Romans 13:11, 12, 1 Peter 4:5). Thus, the Hymanaean heresy contradicted the message of the apostles. The resurrection could not be “at hand” or imminent if it was in fact past already. A similar teaching had occurred some 14 to 18 years earlier in Thessalonica. Many in the church had stopped working because they believed that the day of Christ, i.e. second coming of the Lord had arrived and was already present. That time was A.D. 50, 51, (2 Thessalonians 2:2). Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unm A similar teaching had occurred some 14 to 18 years earlier in Thessalonica. Many in the church had stopped working because they believed that the day of Christ, i.e. second coming of the Lord had arrived and was already present. That time was A.D. 50, 51, (2 Thessalonians 2:2). Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unm Paul responded by telling them that the day of the Lord had not yet come. He also gave them two unmistakeable signs that would leave them without doubt as to its arrival. One, there would come “the apostasy” or “falling away first” of many in the church. Secondly, the man of sin would be revealed.” Thus, they had two events to experience before they could conclude that Christ had come. As before, the apostles continued to teach that the coming of the Lord was “at hand.” (see part 2)
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Solution of Your Urgent Loan Need - Quick Secured Loan Is Quit Claim Deed the Best Option
|