ot;Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza BaffIs there a way to determine if someone has wisdom by reading their online articles? Some authors believe this might be a very tough call. After all how on Earth are we going to verify that and even if we could, it could cost us a bundle in the process right?

Yes, exactly. Verification is tough, as even if you have their resumes? Humans are deceptive and anyone can lie about their credentials. Ronald Reagan use to say "Trust but Verify" and yet that costs lots of time in gathering information or intelligence. If 95% of what we hear or read is complete BS and if 4% is a piece of the puzzle and only 1% is legit, that means it takes 99% of the work to verify the 1%.

If we wish to discover the wise man and do so by reading their articles, then we must understand that the similarities to intelligence gathering and categorizing the value of the information and source in article writing is indeed close. Just because someone has worked in their profession for a long time and gained a little status there, perhaps done a few articles for their industry association and is considered an authority, well that does not necessarily make them a man of wisdom right?

Absolutely, I agree and like to use the 95-5% rule. Only 5% are even excellent at what they do. If we can design a system that uses "Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza Baffl

mes? Humans are deceptive and anyone can lie about their credentials. Ronald Reagan use to say "Trust but Verify" and yet that costs lots of time in gathering information or intelligence. If 95% of what we hear or read is complete BS and if 4% is a piece of the puzzle and only 1% is legit, that means it takes 99% of the work to verify the 1%.

If we wish to discover the wise man and do so by reading their articles, then we must understand that the similarities to intelligence gathering and categorizing the value of the information and source in article writing is indeed close. Just because someone has worked in their profession for a long time and gained a little status there, perhaps done a few articles for their industry association and is considered an authority, well that does not necessarily make them a man of wisdom right?

Absolutely, I agree and like to use the 95-5% rule. Only 5% are even excellent at what they do. If we can design a system that uses "Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza Baff

work to verify the 1%.

If we wish to discover the wise man and do so by reading their articles, then we must understand that the similarities to intelligence gathering and categorizing the value of the information and source in article writing is indeed close. Just because someone has worked in their profession for a long time and gained a little status there, perhaps done a few articles for their industry association and is considered an authority, well that does not necessarily make them a man of wisdom right?

Absolutely, I agree and like to use the 95-5% rule. Only 5% are even excellent at what they do. If we can design a system that uses "Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza Baff

e and gained a little status there, perhaps done a few articles for their industry association and is considered an authority, well that does not necessarily make them a man of wisdom right?

Absolutely, I agree and like to use the 95-5% rule. Only 5% are even excellent at what they do. If we can design a system that uses "Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza Baff

ot;Buzz Word" counts as a non-issue unless they are over used, we may quickly dismiss many posers who are in the field but certainly not experts. My belief is if you are really good in your field you can explain it to a novice or talk with an expert straight across the board and neither of you will need Buzz Word Bonanza Baffling BS to state your ideas, concepts or conclusions.