Hub You
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Real Estate > Investing > Cheap Lots - Lots of Income

Tags

  • guess
  • estatei
  • young
  • cookie cutter
  • first email
  • success building

  • Links

  • Disabled Tourism in New Zealand; Part I
  • Cool Pop Ups Suck
  • The Many Great Benefits of Using Closet Organizers
  • Hub You - Cheap Lots - Lots of Income

    A Philadelphia Personal Injury Lawyer Talks About Traumatic Brain Injury and Brain Injury Claims
    According to the National Institutes of Health, “Traumatic brain injury (TBI), broadly defined as brain injury from externally inflicted trauma, may result in significant impairment of an individual's physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. In the United States, an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people incur TBI each year, principally as a result of vehicular incidents, falls, acts of violence, and sports accidents. The number of people surviving TBI with impairment has increased significantly in recent years, which is attributed to faster and more effective emergency care, quicker and safer transportation to specialized treatment facilities, and advances in acute medical management. TBI affects people of all ages and is the leading cause of long-term disability among children and young adults.Each year, approximately 70,000 to 90,000 individuals incur a TBI resulting in a long-term, substantial loss of functioning. The consequences of TBI include a dramatic change in the individual's life-course, profound disruption of the family, enormous loss of income or earning potential, and large expenses over a lifetime. There are approximately 300,000 hospital admissions annually for persons with mild or moderate TBI, and an additional unknown number of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) that are not diagnosed but may result in long-term disability.”TBI results principally from vehicular accidents, falls, acts of violence, and sports injuries. It is more than twice as likely in males than in females. The highest incidence is among persons 15 to 24 years of age and 75 years and older. Given the large toll of TBI and absence of a cure, prevention is of paramount importance.Available evidence supports the use of certain cognitive and behavioral rehabilitation strategies for individuals with TBI. Increased understanding of the mechanisms of TBI and recovery hold promise for new treatments. Persons with TBI, their families, and significant others are integral to the implementation of the rehabilitation process and research. Rehabilitation services, matched to the needs of persons with TBI, and community-based nonmedical services are needed to optimize outcomes over the course of recovery.
    docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that t

    Children At Work: Looking at Child Labor in the Victorian Age
    Today, it isn’t that uncommon for some children and teenagers to work. They may earn extra money by baby-sitting, doing yard work, or maybe even walking dogs. Others, once they go on to high school, may go to work in their local grocery store, malls, or food chains. However, in the Victorian Age, it wouldn’t seem at all strange to see children as young as five or six, go to work full-time (sometimes sixteen hours a day!) in often dangerous conditions.As you read, ask yourself questions. Why do you think children so young were working? What type of jobs do you do for extra money? What types of jobs did the Victorian Age children have to do? What would you do to help stop child labor? How do you think your life would be different if instead of getting an education, you had to go to work in a paper mill, or on an assembly line?Why Did it Happen?During the first United States Census it was reported that the number of children working in 1870, equalled nearly 750,000. This only included children under the age of fifteen, and didn’t count those children who were working on their family farms, or in the family’s business. The number of children working continued to increase as new technology and the Industry grew. What were some of the things that caused families to send their children to work? What about the employers that hired them?PovertyOne mother in the Victorian Age, Mrs. Smith, was quoted as saying:“I have three children working in Wilson’s mill; one 11, one 13, and the other 14. They work regular hours there. We don’t complain. If they go to drop the hours, I don’t know what poor people will do. We have hard work to live as it is…..My Husband is one of the same mind about it…last summer my husband was 6 weeks ill; we pledged almost all our things to live; the things are not all out of pawn yet… We complain of nothing but short wages…My children have been in the mill three years. I have no complaint to make of their being beaten…I would rather they were beaten than fined.”Another roadblock to change was that most people thought that by letting children have jobs, it would serve to help the poor families to make more money.There were many ways that children entered the workforce. Orphaned children were often sent to a distant mill or f
    Recently I made a great deal on about 16 lots on the Southside of San Antonio. I tend to take the internet for granted but when I think back about the best deals I ever made, I realize that most of them have come from the Internet in one form or another. Now I guess you could say it’s that way because that is where I choose to focus my attention. The truth of the matter is that I’ve done about every kind of marketing that makes sense and you just can’t beat the Internet’s “Bang for the Buck.” At any rate, this deal racked up about $108,000 in less than one year. I know for sure it would have never happened if it was not for the World Wide Web.

    I had been experiencing some success building little 1,200 sq. ft. houses on scattered lots in and around the Southside of San Antonio. I liked the little business and the partner I was involved with so I decided to crank it up a notch or two. I decided to put out the word that I was looking to buy some lots. What is the first thing I do when I decide to “PUT OUT THE WORD?” I go to my computer and start sending out some well thought out messages.

    I have taken great care to collect an extremely large amount of email addresses pertaining to the RE community in my market. Today I have over 6,500 realtors email addresses and another 600 email addresses of RE investors. All of them actively involved in RE in the San Antonio area where I live and work. Because I have learned to network among these email addresses I am reasonably famous in my town for doing what I do… Investing! It is the “BIG FISH in a SMALL POND” kind of syndrome but that’s what you need when you’re searching for deals.

    On this one particular day I decided to hit my entire Investor List first. I normally don’t like to send out more than 250 emails at a time but I was really, REALLY eager to buy some lots and I had all my time freed up to do just that. I honed a message that looked like this;

    ATTENTION INVESTORS Mitch Stephen is looking for scattered lots to build small, affordable houses on. If you come across unwanted lots in the lesser parts of town, I am interested in speaking with you about them.

    The lots must be at least 4,000 Sq. Ft. The lots must be at least 50’ wide.

    I am ready to buy today!

    Mitch Stephen 210-669-4020 Mitch@Homes2Go.NET

    Within about 5 minutes I had constructed the message and sent it out in an email to the 600 or so investors in San Antonio. Now, I’m going to take a little “side step” here and use this paragraph to drive home a message to all of you out there;

    Were else in the world can you hit 100s – even 1,000s - of people in your direct market with a personal message within 5 minutes for virtually FREE??? If you think I’m a bit over the top when I get excited about Internet Marketing? …well that is why! There is no other effective way to reach so many in an instant. So many of the investors I know out there are missing the opportunity completely.

    Now, where were we… oh yeah…I was trying to buy some lots…

    With my email campaign delivered I figured I’d have some lots in inventory within a week or so... and I was right. I didn’t pick up as many as I’d hoped to, but I did have 3 on the hook right away. I was buying lots for $8,000 to $12,000 each. They were standard lots of the minimum size; 50’ X 100’. It was a fair price… not great but not bad either.

    I used the same message but modified it for Realtors. Compared to the INVESTOR COMMUNITY the realtors are a bit touchy… Sooooo, when it comes to the realtors, I methodically send out 250 realtor emails a day instead of hitting the entire group at one time. Let’s do the math;

    I have about 6,500 realtor email addresses, I send out 250 a day, I don’t have to create a new message for 26 days. Actually it’s even longer than that because I don’t send out emails on the weekends or on Holidays. Why don’t I blast all of the realtors at once? I actually spread it out for several reasons:

    1. I don’t want to create more leads than I can respectfully handle. Nothing will hurt your business faster than asking for help and then NOT responding when help calls you. Even if the deal is a complete loser you need to respectfully decline. Imagine a person holding out their hand to shake hands with you and then you decline to extend your own hand… that is what it is like if you don’t respond to an email that has responded to your request.

    2. I don’t want to beat my list of realtors up everyday because they’ll soon request to be “REMOVED” from my LIST. Nobody likes to get hit with an endless barrage of mails day after day. YOU don’t like it and THEY don’t like it…NOBODY likes it!

    3. I want to stay in front of my network every 2 to 3 weeks with a viable message. By presenting myself every 2 or 3 weeks I have a better chance of staying in the forefront of their minds. TOP of MIND AWARNESS is what I want to accomplish. When someone in my network runs across a deal, I want them to think of me.

    4. Some realtors in the community tend to frown on an investor if they think they are available to every other agent out there. I don’t know why that is but it is true. When confronted with agents that want me to sign up with them “exclusively” I always ask them, “Dear Mr. Agent, could they live with only ONE client? If they don’t understand where I’m coming from after that question… I move on without them.

    HINT: It works against you if you put a multitude of email addresses from one real estate office in the same distribution list. That is another reason why I have 26 folders for 6,500 realtors… 250 email addresses to each folder. By having this many folders I can easily spread an office of 26 realtors into one realtor per file.

    Imagine how easy it is for me to generate leads! Imagine how many people recognize my name after a few months! Imagine how many people think of me during the day as deals come across their desks! I simply go to my site, select another 250 realtors, copy and paste the same message into the email and hit send. I can send that same message to a different 250 realtors a day for almost a month before I have to change the message. It takes about 30 seconds a day to send out that message. I do it first thing in the morning before I start my daily adventures. Sometime during the day or in the evening I check my email in box for favorable responses. If I have a lot of responses I will not send out another email message until I have contacted every responder and opted in or out of their proposal or offer.

    In this particular case it wasn’t until about 45 days later that I got the email I had been REALLY looking for. I received an email from an investor named David whom I’d met at the local real estate investment club (San Antonio Real Estate Investment Association – SAREIA) many, many months ago. I can’t tell you how many emails addresses I harvest from my local RE club… but I’d guess it is in the 100s.

    David wanted to know if I was still looking for lots. He went on to explain that he had received my email several weeks ago and that he had saved it just incase he ran across what I was looking for. As luck would have it… he had bumped into a family trying to settle an estate. They needed to sell 16 small lots on the Southside of San Antonio to close out the estate.

    I responded with a phone call to David and he explained the situation. The estate had 16 lots they needed to sell as soon as possible. Selling the lots was the last step in closing out an arduous estate. He asked me how much I could pay per lot and still come out good on the Deal. I told him that I could pay up to $12,000 a lot, but for it to be a GOOD deal for me I’d need it to be around $8,000. David was a smart a shrewd investor. He knew that if he gave me a GOOD DEAL I would be more likely to strike and strike fast. He also knew he could get the lots at a good price. David asked me if I would be upset if he negotiated a deal to purchase the lots for $4,000 and then sold them to me for the $8,000 I told him, as I had stated before, That $8,000 would be a very good deal for me. After all, he offered me the optimum of what I had asked for. I never begrudge the amount of money anyone else makes on the deal if I am happy with my position. I agreed to buy the lots at $8,000 if he could get a contract for less… no matter how much less.

    Later that week David had consummated a deal with the estate at exactly what he had set his sites on… $4,000 per lot. I contracted to buy the lots for $8,000 if everything was fine legally and if I could get a title commitment on each lot. Let’s do the math;

    David would contract the 16 Lots at $4,000 each… total strike price of $64,000 I would agree to buy the 16 lots at $8,000 each… a total price of $128,000

    David had set himself up to make a cool $64,000 in one transaction covering 16 lots and I would have 16 lots at a killer price to build affordable homes on. Did it bother me that David was going to make so much so fast?…not in the least. I would make my money too, eventually.

    As I stated before, I had already had some success building 2 houses from the exact same set of plans on 2 separate lots. I intended to build that exact same house yet again on every lot David was offering to sell me. Obviously, my building costs would be very predictable. My contractors had already absorbed the learning curve and therefore would be able to build the new homes in a “cookie cutter” fashion. My previous experience told me that the homes would be sold before the paint was even dry and that I could expect about a $20,000 minimum profit per home. Let’s do that math;

    16 homes x $20,000 profit each = $320,000

    Needless to say… I was very happy with the deal. I figured I could complete the building and the sales of the homes in about 12 months. I was also ecstatic about the location of the lots. They were in exactly the type of lower income area I was looking for and they were close to a very popular, main thorough fair. I signed the commitment letter for David immediately and awaited closing instructions.

    Things took a turn for the worse when I discovered that the lots were smaller than the size I had requested in my first email to my investor list. I had asked that the lots be at least 50 ft. wide and a minimum of 4,000 sq. ft. in size. These lots measured only 25’ x 100’ and that was way short of what I needed. I could not build a decent home on a lot that was only 25’ wide. Furthermore, the city code wouldn’t allow me to build a house on lots that small.

    I called David and explained to him that no one could build on a lot that was 25’ x 100‘ and that it would take 2 lots to build 1 house. He acknowledged my previous email… and that I had, in fact, requested lots that were at least 50’ x 100’ to build on.

    As luck would have it, many of the lots were contiguous. There was a clump of lots on the main street and a clump of lots across the block and yet another clump just down the street from there. The lots could be easily paired up to create 8 lots measuring 50’ x 100’ lots and thus we made a plan “B.” David would go back to the estate and re-negotiate the deal, explaining to the executrix of the estate that their sales price would have to be cut in half because the lots were too small to build on individually.

    My hat’s off to David. The big problem with all of this negotiating and then re-negotiating was that the estate consisted of 13 heirs. 13 heirs had to agree! I have dealt with my fair share of estates and believe me when I tell you; it is hard enough to get 2 heirs to agree on a sale… much less 13 heirs. Still, David persisted and several weeks later I had a revised contract in my hand and we were off to the races yet again. Now, the math looked like this;

    David had contracted to buy the 16 lots for $2,000 each (down from $4,000 each). It would take 2 lots to equal 1 building site so the 8 building sites would cost me $4,000 each. I had lost 50% of my potential sites but I was still at the price per building site I was excited about.

    David had re-contracted with the estate to buy 16 lots for $2,000 each… $32,000 for 8 building sites.

    In essence, I contracted with David to buy the 8 building sites for $8,000 each… $64,000

    I was down to 8 lots I could build on instead of 16, but I was still happy with the prospect of building 8 homes at a profit of $20,000 each… 8 homes x $20,000 profit each = $160,000 profit

    Everything seemed to move quickly after that. Soon it was time to close and I was off to the title company to sign docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that t

    Fair Trade Fundamentals
    You’re buying coffee. One label says this roasted mountain-fresh Colombian coffee is ideal for all coffee makers. But is it ideal for the coffee bean’s maker, the farmer? Your choice is empowering. When you choose fair trade, you get more than coffee; you get the opportunity to enrich someone’s life.What Is Fair Trade?Fair trade is an international alternative trading system designed to empower disadvantaged farmers, artisans, and labourers. The movement began 50 years ago when international aid organizations worked to help farmers and labourers in Africa break free from oppressive trading practices. These inequitable trading practices still exist today.Farmers and artisans in developing countries rely on intermediaries for market information and trade. These middlemen usually pay less than market price and keep the producers trapped in a cycle of poverty. Small-scale farmers can’t afford to produce the crop. They can’t afford the overhead or their financing’s interest rates. They abandon their farms, or, in the case of some cocoa producers, they “employ” unpaid workers, often children.Through fair trade, farmers and artisans deal directly with members of fair trade organizations, bypassing the middleman and receiving a fair and sustainable wage for their work. According to the Fair Trade Federation, the goal of a member organization is “to benefit the artisans they work with, not maximize profits. By reducing the number of middlemen and minimizing overhead costs, FTOs (fair trade organizations) return up to 40 percent of the retail price of an item to the producer.” Producers receive a fair wage for their product, children are not exploited, and long-term relationships are encouraged to provide continuity in trading. Fair trade considers the enduring well-being of the person behind the product.Who Decides What’s Fair?In Canada, the Fair Trade Certified logo is managed by TransFair Canada, a nonprofit organization that belongs to the international Fairtrade Labeling Organization (FLO). Use of the logo comes with very strict rules and terms, to which all members are bound by contract.The Canadian Fair Trade Certified logo is applied to product-specific items only, meaning that the product, not the company, is certified as fair trade. On the other
    up as many as I’d hoped to, but I did have 3 on the hook right away. I was buying lots for $8,000 to $12,000 each. They were standard lots of the minimum size; 50’ X 100’. It was a fair price… not great but not bad either.

    I used the same message but modified it for Realtors. Compared to the INVESTOR COMMUNITY the realtors are a bit touchy… Sooooo, when it comes to the realtors, I methodically send out 250 realtor emails a day instead of hitting the entire group at one time. Let’s do the math;

    I have about 6,500 realtor email addresses, I send out 250 a day, I don’t have to create a new message for 26 days. Actually it’s even longer than that because I don’t send out emails on the weekends or on Holidays. Why don’t I blast all of the realtors at once? I actually spread it out for several reasons:

    1. I don’t want to create more leads than I can respectfully handle. Nothing will hurt your business faster than asking for help and then NOT responding when help calls you. Even if the deal is a complete loser you need to respectfully decline. Imagine a person holding out their hand to shake hands with you and then you decline to extend your own hand… that is what it is like if you don’t respond to an email that has responded to your request.

    2. I don’t want to beat my list of realtors up everyday because they’ll soon request to be “REMOVED” from my LIST. Nobody likes to get hit with an endless barrage of mails day after day. YOU don’t like it and THEY don’t like it…NOBODY likes it!

    3. I want to stay in front of my network every 2 to 3 weeks with a viable message. By presenting myself every 2 or 3 weeks I have a better chance of staying in the forefront of their minds. TOP of MIND AWARNESS is what I want to accomplish. When someone in my network runs across a deal, I want them to think of me.

    4. Some realtors in the community tend to frown on an investor if they think they are available to every other agent out there. I don’t know why that is but it is true. When confronted with agents that want me to sign up with them “exclusively” I always ask them, “Dear Mr. Agent, could they live with only ONE client? If they don’t understand where I’m coming from after that question… I move on without them.

    HINT: It works against you if you put a multitude of email addresses from one real estate office in the same distribution list. That is another reason why I have 26 folders for 6,500 realtors… 250 email addresses to each folder. By having this many folders I can easily spread an office of 26 realtors into one realtor per file.

    Imagine how easy it is for me to generate leads! Imagine how many people recognize my name after a few months! Imagine how many people think of me during the day as deals come across their desks! I simply go to my site, select another 250 realtors, copy and paste the same message into the email and hit send. I can send that same message to a different 250 realtors a day for almost a month before I have to change the message. It takes about 30 seconds a day to send out that message. I do it first thing in the morning before I start my daily adventures. Sometime during the day or in the evening I check my email in box for favorable responses. If I have a lot of responses I will not send out another email message until I have contacted every responder and opted in or out of their proposal or offer.

    In this particular case it wasn’t until about 45 days later that I got the email I had been REALLY looking for. I received an email from an investor named David whom I’d met at the local real estate investment club (San Antonio Real Estate Investment Association – SAREIA) many, many months ago. I can’t tell you how many emails addresses I harvest from my local RE club… but I’d guess it is in the 100s.

    David wanted to know if I was still looking for lots. He went on to explain that he had received my email several weeks ago and that he had saved it just incase he ran across what I was looking for. As luck would have it… he had bumped into a family trying to settle an estate. They needed to sell 16 small lots on the Southside of San Antonio to close out the estate.

    I responded with a phone call to David and he explained the situation. The estate had 16 lots they needed to sell as soon as possible. Selling the lots was the last step in closing out an arduous estate. He asked me how much I could pay per lot and still come out good on the Deal. I told him that I could pay up to $12,000 a lot, but for it to be a GOOD deal for me I’d need it to be around $8,000. David was a smart a shrewd investor. He knew that if he gave me a GOOD DEAL I would be more likely to strike and strike fast. He also knew he could get the lots at a good price. David asked me if I would be upset if he negotiated a deal to purchase the lots for $4,000 and then sold them to me for the $8,000 I told him, as I had stated before, That $8,000 would be a very good deal for me. After all, he offered me the optimum of what I had asked for. I never begrudge the amount of money anyone else makes on the deal if I am happy with my position. I agreed to buy the lots at $8,000 if he could get a contract for less… no matter how much less.

    Later that week David had consummated a deal with the estate at exactly what he had set his sites on… $4,000 per lot. I contracted to buy the lots for $8,000 if everything was fine legally and if I could get a title commitment on each lot. Let’s do the math;

    David would contract the 16 Lots at $4,000 each… total strike price of $64,000 I would agree to buy the 16 lots at $8,000 each… a total price of $128,000

    David had set himself up to make a cool $64,000 in one transaction covering 16 lots and I would have 16 lots at a killer price to build affordable homes on. Did it bother me that David was going to make so much so fast?…not in the least. I would make my money too, eventually.

    As I stated before, I had already had some success building 2 houses from the exact same set of plans on 2 separate lots. I intended to build that exact same house yet again on every lot David was offering to sell me. Obviously, my building costs would be very predictable. My contractors had already absorbed the learning curve and therefore would be able to build the new homes in a “cookie cutter” fashion. My previous experience told me that the homes would be sold before the paint was even dry and that I could expect about a $20,000 minimum profit per home. Let’s do that math;

    16 homes x $20,000 profit each = $320,000

    Needless to say… I was very happy with the deal. I figured I could complete the building and the sales of the homes in about 12 months. I was also ecstatic about the location of the lots. They were in exactly the type of lower income area I was looking for and they were close to a very popular, main thorough fair. I signed the commitment letter for David immediately and awaited closing instructions.

    Things took a turn for the worse when I discovered that the lots were smaller than the size I had requested in my first email to my investor list. I had asked that the lots be at least 50 ft. wide and a minimum of 4,000 sq. ft. in size. These lots measured only 25’ x 100’ and that was way short of what I needed. I could not build a decent home on a lot that was only 25’ wide. Furthermore, the city code wouldn’t allow me to build a house on lots that small.

    I called David and explained to him that no one could build on a lot that was 25’ x 100‘ and that it would take 2 lots to build 1 house. He acknowledged my previous email… and that I had, in fact, requested lots that were at least 50’ x 100’ to build on.

    As luck would have it, many of the lots were contiguous. There was a clump of lots on the main street and a clump of lots across the block and yet another clump just down the street from there. The lots could be easily paired up to create 8 lots measuring 50’ x 100’ lots and thus we made a plan “B.” David would go back to the estate and re-negotiate the deal, explaining to the executrix of the estate that their sales price would have to be cut in half because the lots were too small to build on individually.

    My hat’s off to David. The big problem with all of this negotiating and then re-negotiating was that the estate consisted of 13 heirs. 13 heirs had to agree! I have dealt with my fair share of estates and believe me when I tell you; it is hard enough to get 2 heirs to agree on a sale… much less 13 heirs. Still, David persisted and several weeks later I had a revised contract in my hand and we were off to the races yet again. Now, the math looked like this;

    David had contracted to buy the 16 lots for $2,000 each (down from $4,000 each). It would take 2 lots to equal 1 building site so the 8 building sites would cost me $4,000 each. I had lost 50% of my potential sites but I was still at the price per building site I was excited about.

    David had re-contracted with the estate to buy 16 lots for $2,000 each… $32,000 for 8 building sites.

    In essence, I contracted with David to buy the 8 building sites for $8,000 each… $64,000

    I was down to 8 lots I could build on instead of 16, but I was still happy with the prospect of building 8 homes at a profit of $20,000 each… 8 homes x $20,000 profit each = $160,000 profit

    Everything seemed to move quickly after that. Soon it was time to close and I was off to the title company to sign docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that t

    Enhancing Customer Shopping Experience
    Today when so many shopping malls, supermarkets and hypermarkets are opening up, each one is competing hard for the customers' money. There are more choices available for consumers than ever before. In such situation retailers must develop business strategies that focus on creating as well as maintaining customers, one by offering customers a differentiated shopping experience. Merchandising and display are important issues that need serious attention in enhancing customer shopping experience.Such big retailers spends lot of money in getting high traffic location but if customers don’t find anything systematic, unique and attractive, they may just pass away from the door or if visited will try some other place to shop next time.Merchandising is much more than simply the arrangement of products on the shelf, it is also about understanding the way customers shop.Hand written boards, posters covering the door and walls, lack of lighting, untidy displays convey that you are not serious about business. So retailers need to create an environment that not only attract customers but also give feeling of comfort and satisfaction, which act as inducing factor for their next visit.Following are the tips to make customer shopping an amazing experience for them:Store Front and Windows:If the store has big front and windows, retailers should exploit it by putting creative displays and offers. It may include sale announcement, about any new product introduced, or about new season’s collection. Any information to be put on front should be attractive and in accordance with cultural norms.Product placement in store:Put the most popular and latest products in front. New products which are attractive and create interest in the mind of customers should be put in the most visible place. Don’t try to keep every thing on display. Keep the display clutter free.A store area can be classified into three types: main merchandising, display and cash. The merchandising area is where customers are visually bombarded with products available for purchase. The cash area is where the final sale takes place and is an excellent area to place small accessory items that appeal to impulse buying. Display spaces are used to create visual excitement and draw attention of customers. It als
    ime during the day or in the evening I check my email in box for favorable responses. If I have a lot of responses I will not send out another email message until I have contacted every responder and opted in or out of their proposal or offer.

    In this particular case it wasn’t until about 45 days later that I got the email I had been REALLY looking for. I received an email from an investor named David whom I’d met at the local real estate investment club (San Antonio Real Estate Investment Association – SAREIA) many, many months ago. I can’t tell you how many emails addresses I harvest from my local RE club… but I’d guess it is in the 100s.

    David wanted to know if I was still looking for lots. He went on to explain that he had received my email several weeks ago and that he had saved it just incase he ran across what I was looking for. As luck would have it… he had bumped into a family trying to settle an estate. They needed to sell 16 small lots on the Southside of San Antonio to close out the estate.

    I responded with a phone call to David and he explained the situation. The estate had 16 lots they needed to sell as soon as possible. Selling the lots was the last step in closing out an arduous estate. He asked me how much I could pay per lot and still come out good on the Deal. I told him that I could pay up to $12,000 a lot, but for it to be a GOOD deal for me I’d need it to be around $8,000. David was a smart a shrewd investor. He knew that if he gave me a GOOD DEAL I would be more likely to strike and strike fast. He also knew he could get the lots at a good price. David asked me if I would be upset if he negotiated a deal to purchase the lots for $4,000 and then sold them to me for the $8,000 I told him, as I had stated before, That $8,000 would be a very good deal for me. After all, he offered me the optimum of what I had asked for. I never begrudge the amount of money anyone else makes on the deal if I am happy with my position. I agreed to buy the lots at $8,000 if he could get a contract for less… no matter how much less.

    Later that week David had consummated a deal with the estate at exactly what he had set his sites on… $4,000 per lot. I contracted to buy the lots for $8,000 if everything was fine legally and if I could get a title commitment on each lot. Let’s do the math;

    David would contract the 16 Lots at $4,000 each… total strike price of $64,000 I would agree to buy the 16 lots at $8,000 each… a total price of $128,000

    David had set himself up to make a cool $64,000 in one transaction covering 16 lots and I would have 16 lots at a killer price to build affordable homes on. Did it bother me that David was going to make so much so fast?…not in the least. I would make my money too, eventually.

    As I stated before, I had already had some success building 2 houses from the exact same set of plans on 2 separate lots. I intended to build that exact same house yet again on every lot David was offering to sell me. Obviously, my building costs would be very predictable. My contractors had already absorbed the learning curve and therefore would be able to build the new homes in a “cookie cutter” fashion. My previous experience told me that the homes would be sold before the paint was even dry and that I could expect about a $20,000 minimum profit per home. Let’s do that math;

    16 homes x $20,000 profit each = $320,000

    Needless to say… I was very happy with the deal. I figured I could complete the building and the sales of the homes in about 12 months. I was also ecstatic about the location of the lots. They were in exactly the type of lower income area I was looking for and they were close to a very popular, main thorough fair. I signed the commitment letter for David immediately and awaited closing instructions.

    Things took a turn for the worse when I discovered that the lots were smaller than the size I had requested in my first email to my investor list. I had asked that the lots be at least 50 ft. wide and a minimum of 4,000 sq. ft. in size. These lots measured only 25’ x 100’ and that was way short of what I needed. I could not build a decent home on a lot that was only 25’ wide. Furthermore, the city code wouldn’t allow me to build a house on lots that small.

    I called David and explained to him that no one could build on a lot that was 25’ x 100‘ and that it would take 2 lots to build 1 house. He acknowledged my previous email… and that I had, in fact, requested lots that were at least 50’ x 100’ to build on.

    As luck would have it, many of the lots were contiguous. There was a clump of lots on the main street and a clump of lots across the block and yet another clump just down the street from there. The lots could be easily paired up to create 8 lots measuring 50’ x 100’ lots and thus we made a plan “B.” David would go back to the estate and re-negotiate the deal, explaining to the executrix of the estate that their sales price would have to be cut in half because the lots were too small to build on individually.

    My hat’s off to David. The big problem with all of this negotiating and then re-negotiating was that the estate consisted of 13 heirs. 13 heirs had to agree! I have dealt with my fair share of estates and believe me when I tell you; it is hard enough to get 2 heirs to agree on a sale… much less 13 heirs. Still, David persisted and several weeks later I had a revised contract in my hand and we were off to the races yet again. Now, the math looked like this;

    David had contracted to buy the 16 lots for $2,000 each (down from $4,000 each). It would take 2 lots to equal 1 building site so the 8 building sites would cost me $4,000 each. I had lost 50% of my potential sites but I was still at the price per building site I was excited about.

    David had re-contracted with the estate to buy 16 lots for $2,000 each… $32,000 for 8 building sites.

    In essence, I contracted with David to buy the 8 building sites for $8,000 each… $64,000

    I was down to 8 lots I could build on instead of 16, but I was still happy with the prospect of building 8 homes at a profit of $20,000 each… 8 homes x $20,000 profit each = $160,000 profit

    Everything seemed to move quickly after that. Soon it was time to close and I was off to the title company to sign docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that t

    Affordable Advertising Agencies
    Low cost internet advertising agencies are the ideal way and most recommended means to make your product or service known and for your web site to earn money. There is such a very huge range of affordable internet advertising agencies that are now found in the Net.There are various Internet advertising agencies according to the kind of product or service they provide. Here is a list of a few of these kinds of online marketing agencies.1. Web design agenciesThese are focused on building web pages for a website. Many web developers are now offering affordable services if you just know how and where to find them.2. Logo servicesProduction of web site logos is the main concern of these agencies. Hundreds of pre-designed logos could be purchased or even customized to complement your website better.3. Copywriting AgenciesIn adjunct to search engine optimization, these agencies provide quality content that targets the attention of the market you intend to tap. Looking for the best deals with copywriting services will be a cinch if you know where to look. If you prefer freelancers, they are often found with their own websites.4. Search engine optimization companiesThese companies analyze and modify websites in order to achieve the highest possible search engine ranking. They improve your website's design and content to better attract more traffic. Link building could also be employed by these e-marketing agencies to benefit your business. They are actually a combination of all the services mentioned above. Sometimes they also go by the name of Internet marketing consultancies or something of that sort.5. Domain registration companiesYour business's name in the web is the business of these companies. Looking for the best amongst a wide array of these agencies is like looking for a needle in a haystack. But if you are determined enough to do your homework with these marketing services, results would be more than rewarding. Just make sure that you don't register with those whose only intention is to rip off those who can't afford the most reputable domain registration agencies.These are just a few of the Internet advertising agencies that a web marketing newbie could turn to. Examining your needs first will better your chances in gettin
    “cookie cutter” fashion. My previous experience told me that the homes would be sold before the paint was even dry and that I could expect about a $20,000 minimum profit per home. Let’s do that math;

    16 homes x $20,000 profit each = $320,000

    Needless to say… I was very happy with the deal. I figured I could complete the building and the sales of the homes in about 12 months. I was also ecstatic about the location of the lots. They were in exactly the type of lower income area I was looking for and they were close to a very popular, main thorough fair. I signed the commitment letter for David immediately and awaited closing instructions.

    Things took a turn for the worse when I discovered that the lots were smaller than the size I had requested in my first email to my investor list. I had asked that the lots be at least 50 ft. wide and a minimum of 4,000 sq. ft. in size. These lots measured only 25’ x 100’ and that was way short of what I needed. I could not build a decent home on a lot that was only 25’ wide. Furthermore, the city code wouldn’t allow me to build a house on lots that small.

    I called David and explained to him that no one could build on a lot that was 25’ x 100‘ and that it would take 2 lots to build 1 house. He acknowledged my previous email… and that I had, in fact, requested lots that were at least 50’ x 100’ to build on.

    As luck would have it, many of the lots were contiguous. There was a clump of lots on the main street and a clump of lots across the block and yet another clump just down the street from there. The lots could be easily paired up to create 8 lots measuring 50’ x 100’ lots and thus we made a plan “B.” David would go back to the estate and re-negotiate the deal, explaining to the executrix of the estate that their sales price would have to be cut in half because the lots were too small to build on individually.

    My hat’s off to David. The big problem with all of this negotiating and then re-negotiating was that the estate consisted of 13 heirs. 13 heirs had to agree! I have dealt with my fair share of estates and believe me when I tell you; it is hard enough to get 2 heirs to agree on a sale… much less 13 heirs. Still, David persisted and several weeks later I had a revised contract in my hand and we were off to the races yet again. Now, the math looked like this;

    David had contracted to buy the 16 lots for $2,000 each (down from $4,000 each). It would take 2 lots to equal 1 building site so the 8 building sites would cost me $4,000 each. I had lost 50% of my potential sites but I was still at the price per building site I was excited about.

    David had re-contracted with the estate to buy 16 lots for $2,000 each… $32,000 for 8 building sites.

    In essence, I contracted with David to buy the 8 building sites for $8,000 each… $64,000

    I was down to 8 lots I could build on instead of 16, but I was still happy with the prospect of building 8 homes at a profit of $20,000 each… 8 homes x $20,000 profit each = $160,000 profit

    Everything seemed to move quickly after that. Soon it was time to close and I was off to the title company to sign docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that t

    Miami Real Estate Housing Market for 2007: What Trading in Housing Futures Foretell
    Prices of homes will even be lower a year from now in the Miami real estate housing market—at least, according to what investors speculating on housing real estates suppose. Chicago Mercantile Exchange trading in housing futures point to home price drops by August of next year amounting to 6.8 percent for the Miami real estate housing market; the predicted price decline in Miami is well above the average drop in 10 leading real estate markets of the United States.The speculations by traders in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) are fairly consistent with the results from a survey conducted by Moody’s Economy.com, which examines the 100 largest real estate markets in the U.S. Economy.com predicts that real estate housing markets will first get worse before they get better again, in the perspective of property sellers of course. The survey considered mortgage rates, the local job market and other factors to come up with the figures. According to this survey, the Miami real estate housing market is yet to experience its deepest home price decline of 5.5 percent by the second quarter of 2008. Nationwide, the study forecasts a 3.6 percent decline in the sales price of existing homes.The S&P CME Housing Futures and Options, which took off during the Spring of this year, enabled investors to circumvent against a decline in the value of housing properties in the future or to bet that those values will rise. The investments are connected with the Case-Shiller Home Price Indices. Robert Shiller, author of "Irrational Exuberance," claims that the results of the CME trading in housing futures offer a substantial predictive value. In Shiller’s words, “[The trading results] gives us a finger on the pulse of the [real estate] markets.” As a matter of fact, prior to the launch of this trading, real estate speculators had seen a narrow opportunity to invest in housing markets short of going out and buying actual properties.Richard DeKaser, who is National City Corporation’s chief economist, is pessimistic about the results of the trading though. According to him, because of the novelty of investment vehicles that CME introduced just this year, the trading may not offer the same level of predictive power as other derivatives products. DeKaser points out that the problem lies in the fact that r
    docs. It was turning out to be a routine closing when suddenly the closing agent asked me to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that the lots were situated over the “Kelly Plume.”

    Now, exactly what is “The Kelly Plume?” Well, as it turns out, the “Kelly Plume” is a region of land that has been affected by chemicals used by the Kelly Air Force Base to clean and rebuild jet engines. A toxic chemical used by the air force beginning in the 1950s (a practice that ended years ago) had been steadily soaking into the ground and had affected a water table some 80 feet below the surface. Over the years it had spread. It had permeated out under numerous neighborhoods throughout the Southside. Apparently it was gaining some media attention at the time. They wanted me to sign off on a disclaimer and, more specifically, newspaper articles that proclaimed this as an EPA hazard. Needless to say, I was heartbroken. I stopped signing papers and the deal was left dead on the table. I sited “Undo Duress” as my reason for not closing because there had been no mention of this in the events leading up to the closing. Nobody argued my reasoning.

    I called David to tell him of the unfortunate events. As you can imagine, he was heartbroken as well. After all, he was a day away from receiving a nice paycheck for his entrepreneurial efforts… now all was lost. None the less, David was a consummate Pro. He took the change of events in stride and agreed that I had done the logical thing by NOT closing the deal. I was relieved that David understood because the last thing I want to do is sign up for a deal and not close. I’ll say it again, David was a consummate pro.

    It took me a day or two to get over the loss. Never letting a deal die easily I began to rationalize the prospect of going ahead with the deal;

    1. I could build the homes at a cost of $60,000 total investment (Land Included) and sell them with a disclaimer acknowledging the Plume. It was a reasonable thought because I could actually reason with potential Buyers that the city did NOT use that water. Every Restaurant, YMCA, School, Hospital and Household in the region used water piped from a completely different source. In fact, the only way that specific water would be a problem is if someone actually drilled a well that tapped the contaminated water. People are not going to drill a “private” well in an inner city which offers clean water at the spigot. The deal was still over stressed. I would have too much money invested to take that kind of risk.

    2. I could buy the lots and sell the lots ONLY. If I didn’t have to build a house on the lots I would only be into each building site for $8,000. I could possibly sell the lots for $15,000 each, but still, it didn’t meet my “Risk Reward” comfort level

    I did my best to consider all options, but as far as I was concerned, the deal died at the closing. There was nothing left to do about it. Having to sell with a “DISCLAIMER” was too much. The financial liability was too great.

    I can’t tell you how many days past after that, maybe a month or two or three, but one day I got yet another call from David. He told me that the Estate was desperate to sell the lots and bring an end to their dilemma. They wanted me to make an offer. I told David that I did not want to be insensitive but if I had to make an offer I would offer $500 per building site ($4,000 Total). Plus, we agreed I would pay David an additional $4,000 for his efforts. My total investment for the 8 building sites would be $8,000. My thoughts were;

    1. People living in that area knew that the plume was not affecting their lives.

    2. I could definitely sell the building sites for something over $1,000 per building site…even if I had to give a disclaimer. My immediate calculations said I could possibly sell the sites for as much as $15,000 to someone who understood #1 above… even with the disclaimer.

    3. If I could not sell the lots TODAY I could sell them in the future. Clean up plans were being worked on, be it 1 year or 10 years from now, the $8,000 I had invested would pay me back before it was all said and done.

    4. If I lost $8,000 it would not be the end of my world.

    With that mindset I consummated a deal with David. David managed to strike the deal with the Estate and we closed shortly there after. In the proceeding months I sold all of the 8 building sites with FULL DISCLOSURES for roughly $15,000 each. Once again, let’s do the math;

    I had $8,000 invested in 8 building sites ($4,000 to the Estate and $4,000 to David). Because I was offering such a low price I had to incur all of the closing costs which totaled an additional $4,000. Including the closing costs I had $12,000 invested in 8 building sites. I sold the 8 sites for $15,000 each…. 8 x $15,000 = $120,000… less my $12,000 investment… Total profit = $108,000. Of course I had some advertising and some sign expenses and some gas and some time involved as well… but let’s not trip over the pennies on the way to the dollars. It was a very good deal.

    If there is a “moral” to the story it is this:

    NEVER let a deal die on your side of the table… because David exercised that theory, I was able to exercise the theory as well.

    SIDE NOTE: I never knew that the building sites would actually sell for what they eventually sold for. I had a hunch that they could be worth as much as $15,000 per site but given the fact that I had to sell with such an ominous disclaimer I was not for certain what would happen. I placed my advertisements at the top of my expectations knowing that I could reduce my price if the market was staunch. I did not make the deal I made because I was trying to make a terrific profit. I made the deal I made because I was afraid that I would get stuck with a loss. I did, however, give myself the CHANCE to make a terrific profit. This time my “calculated risk” worked out better than I had planned… by a long shot.

    TAKE ACTION TODAY VISIT www.WealthAddress.com

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.iadvice.info/article/139518/iadvice-Cheap-Lots--Lots-of-Income.html">Cheap Lots - Lots of Income</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.iadvice.info/article/139518/iadvice-Cheap-Lots--Lots-of-Income.html]Cheap Lots - Lots of Income[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Can You Make Money With A Home Based Business?

    Top Ten Ways to Drive Targeted Buyers to Your Web Site

    Online Fast Loans - Your Answer for Cash in a Hurry

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com