over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly The is one simple but incredibly effective step you can take to dramatically increase your wealth. It’s a step, which, for a typical family, could mean anything from ?100 to ?2,000 or even more, tax-free, to spend or save every month. Interested? All it involves is reviewing your loans – mortgage, bank borrowing, leasing, credit cards and other debts – and re-organising them so that you pay the lowest amount of interest and repayment. This may not sound a very worthwhile activity so let me start with a real-life example.

The Pattersons are in a good financial position with two incomes and plenty of equity in their home. Before taking action their borrowings were as follows:

Type of loan Remaining term Rate Amount Monthly cost

Mortgage 18 yrs (25yr term) 4.03% ? 234K ? 1239.02

Home improvement 4 yrs (5 yr term) 8.5% ? 18K ? 369.30

Car loan 2 yrs (4 yr term) 7.5% ? 20K ? 483.58

Credit Card 1 N/A 16.9% ? 6K ? 300.00

Credit Card 2 N/A 10% ? 4K ? 200.00

Store Card N/A 23% ? 8K ? 400.00

Although they could well afford the total cost of their loan repayments – a staggering ? 2991.90 a month – they were paying much more than they needed to for their borrowing. They decided to consolidate – in other words, move all their debt (? 290,000) to a single lender – and thus benefit from a considerably lower rate of interest. In fact, as they own their own home, they were able to find them a new mortgage at just 3.5% a year – only 1% over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly p

nd repayment. This may not sound a very worthwhile activity so let me start with a real-life example.

The Pattersons are in a good financial position with two incomes and plenty of equity in their home. Before taking action their borrowings were as follows:

Type of loan Remaining term Rate Amount Monthly cost

Mortgage 18 yrs (25yr term) 4.03% ? 234K ? 1239.02

Home improvement 4 yrs (5 yr term) 8.5% ? 18K ? 369.30

Car loan 2 yrs (4 yr term) 7.5% ? 20K ? 483.58

Credit Card 1 N/A 16.9% ? 6K ? 300.00

Credit Card 2 N/A 10% ? 4K ? 200.00

Store Card N/A 23% ? 8K ? 400.00

Although they could well afford the total cost of their loan repayments – a staggering ? 2991.90 a month – they were paying much more than they needed to for their borrowing. They decided to consolidate – in other words, move all their debt (? 290,000) to a single lender – and thus benefit from a considerably lower rate of interest. In fact, as they own their own home, they were able to find them a new mortgage at just 3.5% a year – only 1% over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly

>Home improvement 4 yrs (5 yr term) 8.5% ? 18K ? 369.30

Car loan 2 yrs (4 yr term) 7.5% ? 20K ? 483.58

Credit Card 1 N/A 16.9% ? 6K ? 300.00

Credit Card 2 N/A 10% ? 4K ? 200.00

Store Card N/A 23% ? 8K ? 400.00

Although they could well afford the total cost of their loan repayments – a staggering ? 2991.90 a month – they were paying much more than they needed to for their borrowing. They decided to consolidate – in other words, move all their debt (? 290,000) to a single lender – and thus benefit from a considerably lower rate of interest. In fact, as they own their own home, they were able to find them a new mortgage at just 3.5% a year – only 1% over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly

d well afford the total cost of their loan repayments – a staggering ? 2991.90 a month – they were paying much more than they needed to for their borrowing. They decided to consolidate – in other words, move all their debt (? 290,000) to a single lender – and thus benefit from a considerably lower rate of interest. In fact, as they own their own home, they were able to find them a new mortgage at just 3.5% a year – only 1% over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly over the European Central Bank rate. This gave the Pattersons two choices. They could carry on paying the same amount each month. The advantage of this would be that their mortgage (and all their other debts) would be paid off sooner – in just under 10 years – and also that they would save a staggering ? 115,217 in interest. Or they could take advantage of the lower interest rate they had negotiated to cut their monthly payments to just ? 1451.81 – a reduction of ? 1540.09 ! However, if they decided to go for an interest only loan ( repaying the full amount at the end of the term or by lump sum reductions at no penalty costs during the term) their repayment at the same interest rate would be down to just ? 845.83 per month ! The Pattersons went for the ?1451.81 monthly payment and decided to invest the difference in bonds. As a result they are looking forward to receiving a lump sum in excess of ?180,000 the same year they pay their mortgage off and will be free to pursue other, exciting investment opportunities.

Should you be following the Pattersons’ example and thinking of consolidating your debt? If you have a variety of loans at different rates then it could save you a great deal of money. However, consolidating loans in with your mortgage should be an once-in-a-lifetime strategy. This is because what you are doing is converting short-term, expensive debt to long-term, inexpensive debt. If you repeat the process then what you will gain in lower interest rates, you will lose in a longer repayment term. Consolidation requires discipline, too. You’ll be no better off if you replace one set of high interest loans with another, or if you don’t use your monthly ‘saving’ to good purpose.

Whether or not you consolidate, it goes without saying that you should review your level of indebtedness on a regular basis. In particular, you should:

- Check that you have the most competitive mortgage rate available. If you save just 0.5% a year over the term of a 25 year, ?250K home loan, it will be worth a staggering ? 20,409 to you. - Avoid borrowing